Alien Reproduction Vehicle aka Fluxliner - Revision history

Robert.francis.jr at 22:30, 18 June 2026

2026-06-18T22:30:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 18 June 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	<h3 class="mt-2">Norton Air Force Base Air Show in November 12th 1988</h3>		<h3 class="mt-2">Norton Air Force Base Air Show in November 12th 1988</h3>

	According to Mark McCandlish, his colleague "Brad" and a VIP client of Brad's attended an air show at Norton Air Force Base on November 12th 1988 and while there the VIP took "Brad" with him to a large hanger whose access was restricted with guards posted. The VIP asked to see an individual inside, a man in a three-piece suit came out and instantly recognized the VIP. The VIP passed "Brad" off as an aide and the two were ushered inside to see the presentation in the hanger with the VIP.		<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>According to Mark McCandlish, his colleague "Brad" and a VIP client of Brad's attended an air show at Norton Air Force Base on November 12th 1988 and while there the VIP took "Brad" with him to a large hanger whose access was restricted with guards posted. The VIP asked to see an individual inside, a man in a three-piece suit came out and instantly recognized the VIP. The VIP passed "Brad" off as an aide and the two were ushered inside to see the presentation in the hanger with the VIP.</p>

	Inside the hanger "Brad" saw displays of several prototype aircraft including the craft that lost to Northrop Grumman's B2 Stealth Bomber. The real star of the show was hidden behind a big black curtain. With all the delegates in the room at the display the curtain was taken back and three ARV's of different sizes but the same design and proportions were seen: 24ft, 60ft, and 120ft in diameter. It is claimed that a General gave a presentation there to the crowd which included several politicians who were deemed to have a "Need to Know". The presentation was being given to this crowd in order to get their support to fund the construction of a number of ARVs for the military including for use as tactical nuclear weapons delivery platforms as it was believed that it would be virtually impossible to stop them. Considering there are no public photos of ARV shaped UFOs since the photo in 1967 not even at the presentation at the air show in 1988 it is possible the construction of a fleet of ARVs never happened. According to the General giving the presentation the ARV was capable of faster than light travel though it was not stated whether that was limited to the biggest ARV or if all three ARV's were capable.		Inside the hanger "Brad" saw displays of several prototype aircraft including the craft that lost to Northrop Grumman's B2 Stealth Bomber. The real star of the show was hidden behind a big black curtain. With all the delegates in the room at the display the curtain was taken back and three ARV's of different sizes but the same design and proportions were seen: 24ft, 60ft, and 120ft in diameter. It is claimed that a General gave a presentation there to the crowd which included several politicians who were deemed to have a "Need to Know". The presentation was being given to this crowd in order to get their support to fund the construction of a number of ARVs for the military including for use as tactical nuclear weapons delivery platforms as it was believed that it would be virtually impossible to stop them. Considering there are no public photos of ARV shaped UFOs since the photo in 1967 not even at the presentation at the air show in 1988 it is possible the construction of a fleet of ARVs never happened. According to the General giving the presentation the ARV was capable of faster than light travel though it was not stated whether that was limited to the biggest ARV or if all three ARV's were capable.</div>

	<h3 class="mt-2">Disclosure Project Press Conference in May 9th 2001</h3>		<h3 class="mt-2">Disclosure Project Press Conference in May 9th 2001</h3>

Robert.francis.jr at 22:27, 18 June 2026

2026-06-18T22:27:43Z

Robert.francis.jr at 22:12, 18 June 2026

2026-06-18T22:12:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 18 June 2026
Line 68:		Line 68:
	<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>Most Biefeld-Brown effect experiments in the record have used static DC voltages. This is ok for a capacitor that uses asymmetric electrostatic pressure for propulsion but a far larger propulsive effect can be generated by using pulsed DC voltages instead.</p>		<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>Most Biefeld-Brown effect experiments in the record have used static DC voltages. This is ok for a capacitor that uses asymmetric electrostatic pressure for propulsion but a far larger propulsive effect can be generated by using pulsed DC voltages instead.</p>

	Thomas Townsend Brown while working with the French company SUD Aviation on the BBE stated that while he was cleared to work with them on static aspects of the Biefeld-Brown effect, dynamic aspects (in other words, pulsed voltages) had been classified by the U.S. government. This revelation by Brown was reported in the Montgolfier Project document that SUD Aviation released.		Thomas Townsend Brown while working with the French company SUD Aviation on the BBE stated that while he was cleared to work with them on static aspects of the Biefeld-Brown effect, dynamic aspects (in other words, pulsed voltages) had been classified by the U.S. government. This revelation by Brown was reported in the Montgolfier Project document that SUD Aviation released on page 111 of the PDF, available in the Media section of this page.

	It is our belief that when pulsed voltages are applied to an asymmetric capacitor that during charging it temporarily results in unpaired nucleon spin polarization in the capacitor and a propulsive effect. That said, by continuously applying pulsed voltages to a capacitor it will eventually charge up and then behave like a capacitor with a static DC voltage applied.		It is our belief that when pulsed voltages are applied to an asymmetric capacitor that during charging it temporarily results in unpaired nucleon spin polarization in the capacitor and a propulsive effect. That said, by continuously applying pulsed voltages to a capacitor it will eventually charge up and then behave like a capacitor with a static DC voltage applied.

Robert.francis.jr at 22:07, 18 June 2026

2026-06-18T22:07:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 18 June 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<h2>~~RFJ~~'s Breakdown of the ARV</h2>		<h2>Origin of the "Alien Reproduction Vehicle"</h2>

			<h3 class="mt-2">Norton Air Force Base Air Show in November 12th 1988</h3>

			According to Mark McCandlish, his colleague "Brad" and a VIP client of Brad's attended an air show at Norton Air Force Base on November 12th 1988 and while there the VIP took "Brad" with him to a large hanger whose access was restricted with guards posted. The VIP asked to see an individual inside, a man in a three-piece suit came out and instantly recognized the VIP. The VIP passed "Brad" off as an aide and the two were ushered inside to see the presentation in the hanger with the VIP.

			Inside the hanger "Brad" saw displays of several prototype aircraft including the craft that lost to Northrop Grumman's B2 Stealth Bomber. The real star of the show was hidden behind a big black curtain. With all the delegates in the room at the display the curtain was taken back and three ARV's of different sizes but the same design and proportions were seen: 24ft, 60ft, and 120ft in diameter. It is claimed that a General gave a presentation there to the crowd which included several politicians who were deemed to have a "Need to Know". The presentation was being given to this crowd in order to get their support to fund the construction of a number of ARVs for the military including for use as tactical nuclear weapons delivery platforms as it was believed that it would be virtually impossible to stop them. Considering there are no public photos of ARV shaped UFOs since the photo in 1967 not even at the presentation at the air show in 1988 it is possible the construction of a fleet of ARVs never happened. According to the General giving the presentation the ARV was capable of faster than light travel though it was not stated whether that was limited to the biggest ARV or if all three ARV's were capable.

			<h3 class="mt-2">Disclosure Project Press Conference in May 9th 2001</h3>

			<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>The first real reveal of the ARV to the public at large occurred at the Disclosure Project Press Conference on May 9th, 2001 where Mark McCandlish displayed a line art blueprint of the ARV created from "Brad's" description to Mark. Here it was revealed that the ARV had four main components.</p>

			On the bottom it appeared the craft had a capacitor array with approximately forty-two triangular wedges with each wedge containing eight copper plates, separated and encased in a transparent green plastic or glass. An electromagnetic coil around the circumference of the craft approximately twelve feet in diameter, eighteen inches wide on the top surface, and is nine inches in total vertical thickness with an estimated 1,000 turns of 1/4" x 1/4" square copper rod. An aluminum flywheel in the passenger compartment at the midpoint of the craft. And a central column that was called an amplifier that somehow generated electricity for the craft to run on.</div>

			<h2>Robert Francis Jr's Breakdown of the ARV</h2>

	<h3>Capacitor Array</h3>		<h3>Capacitor Array</h3>

	<h4>Biefeld-Brown Effect: Electrostatics or Unpaired Nucleon Spin Polarization</h4>		<h4>Biefeld-Brown Effect: Electrostatics, Unpaired Nucleon Spin Polarization, or Something Else Entirely?</h4>

	<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>The Biefeld-Brown effect is largely seen in the scientific eye as lifters that are propelled by ion wind that they create by charging a positive and negative electrode to high voltages. Since there is no air in space to ionize and push off of lifters don't work in vacuum.</p>		<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>The Biefeld-Brown effect is largely seen in the scientific eye as lifters that are propelled by ion wind that they create by charging a positive and negative electrode to high voltages in the 30kV to 50kV range. Since there is no air in space to ionize and push off of lifters don't work in vacuum.</p>

	The next, slightly more accepted method of propulsion by BBE is asymmetric electrostatic pressure. This method charges up an asymmetric capacitor with a solid dielectric between the positive and negative electrodes using a static voltage that is varied slightly to maintain a persistent acceleration with Exodus Propulsion achieving a thrust of 1G.		The next, slightly more accepted method of propulsion by BBE is asymmetric electrostatic pressure. This method charges up an asymmetric capacitor with a solid dielectric between the positive and negative electrodes using a static voltage that is varied slightly to maintain a persistent acceleration with Exodus Propulsion achieving a thrust of 1G.

	~~The final,~~ mostly unconsidered aspect of BBE is in creating unpaired nucleon spin polarization in the capacitor array's electrodes and its dielectric. If the ARV's capacitor array was propelled strictly by asymmetric electrostatic pressure there would be no reason to make the ~~electrodes~~ in the capacitor array 1/2" thick. Cost and weight could be drastically reduced by using thin sheet metal for the ~~electrodes~~. However, if the ARV is propelled by unpaired nucleon spin polarization then, the more mass, the more atoms with unpaired nucleons, the greater the propulsive effect.</div>		A mostly unconsidered aspect of BBE is it could possibly be creating unpaired nucleon spin polarization in the capacitor array's electrodes and its dielectric. If the ARV's capacitor array was propelled strictly by asymmetric electrostatic pressure there would be no reason to make the capacitor plates in the capacitor array 1/2" thick. Cost and weight could be drastically reduced by using thin sheet metal for the plates. However, if the ARV is propelled by unpaired nucleon spin polarization then, the more mass, the more atoms with unpaired nucleons that are polarized in the same direction, the greater the propulsive effect. This idea was first seen in two patents by GE aerospace engineer Henry William Wallace in 1971 where he used high speed rotation of a brass disc to generate a small amount of unpaired nucleon spin polarization in the copper atoms in the disc.</div>

	<h4>Seven Capacitors Per Wedge, Not Four</h4>		<h4>Seven Capacitors Per Wedge, Not Four</h4>

	<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>~~First, the~~ capacitor array triangular wedges are not four capacitors layered on top of each other with conductive plates alternating starting with negative on the bottom, then positive, then negative, then positive, etc, as Mark McCandlish and Gordon Novel believed.</p>		<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>The capacitor array's triangular wedges are not four capacitors layered on top of each other with conductive plates alternating starting with negative on the bottom, then positive, then negative, then positive, etc, as Mark McCandlish and Gordon Novel believed.</p>

	The capacitor array wedges consist of seven capacitors that are used all at the same time. The plate at the bottom has the lowest voltage, the plate above it has a higher voltage, the plate above that has an even higher voltage, etc. By doing this the capacitor wedges have a total of seven capacitors instead of four, enabling a greater propulsive force than if the wedges consisted of only four capacitors.		The capacitor array wedges consist of seven capacitors that are used all at the same time. The plate at the bottom has the lowest voltage, the plate above it has a higher voltage, the plate above that has an even higher voltage, etc. By doing this the capacitor wedges have a total of seven capacitors instead of four, enabling a greater propulsive force than if the wedges consisted of only four capacitors.
Line 54:		Line 68:
	<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>Most Biefeld-Brown effect experiments in the record have used static DC voltages. This is ok for a capacitor that uses asymmetric electrostatic pressure for propulsion but a far larger propulsive effect can be generated by using pulsed DC voltages instead.</p>		<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>Most Biefeld-Brown effect experiments in the record have used static DC voltages. This is ok for a capacitor that uses asymmetric electrostatic pressure for propulsion but a far larger propulsive effect can be generated by using pulsed DC voltages instead.</p>

	Thomas Townsend Brown while working with the French company SUD Aviation on BBE stated that while he was cleared to work with them on static aspects of the Biefeld-Brown effect, dynamic aspects (in other words, pulsed voltages) had been classified by the U.S. government. This revelation by Brown was reported in the Montgolfier Project document that SUD Aviation released.		Thomas Townsend Brown while working with the French company SUD Aviation on the BBE stated that while he was cleared to work with them on static aspects of the Biefeld-Brown effect, dynamic aspects (in other words, pulsed voltages) had been classified by the U.S. government. This revelation by Brown was reported in the Montgolfier Project document that SUD Aviation released.

	It is our belief that when pulsed voltages are applied to an asymmetric capacitor that during charging it temporarily results in unpaired nucleon spin polarization in the capacitor and a propulsive effect. That said, by continuously applying pulsed voltages to a capacitor it will eventually charge up and then behave like a capacitor with a static DC voltage applied.		It is our belief that when pulsed voltages are applied to an asymmetric capacitor that during charging it temporarily results in unpaired nucleon spin polarization in the capacitor and a propulsive effect. That said, by continuously applying pulsed voltages to a capacitor it will eventually charge up and then behave like a capacitor with a static DC voltage applied.

Robert.francis.jr at 23:30, 23 May 2026

2026-05-23T23:30:27Z

Show changes

Robert.francis.jr at 18:38, 21 May 2026

2026-05-21T18:38:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:38, 21 May 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<h2>~~Our~~ Breakdown of the ARV</h2>		<h2>RFJ's Breakdown of the ARV</h2>

	<h3>Capacitor Array</h3>		<h3>Capacitor Array</h3>

Robert.francis.jr at 17:23, 21 May 2026

2026-05-21T17:23:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:23, 21 May 2026
Line 109:		Line 109:

	<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>This component more than any other has been difficult to decipher. McCandlish stated the column was partially under vacuum with Mercury vapor inside. Were the Mercury isotopes ones with an unpaired Neutron? That is unknown. High voltage discharges were said to occur down through the vapor. It is not clear to me from the available testimony how the energy generator in the central column functioned.</p></div>		<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>This component more than any other has been difficult to decipher. McCandlish stated the column was partially under vacuum with Mercury vapor inside. Were the Mercury isotopes ones with an unpaired Neutron? That is unknown. High voltage discharges were said to occur down through the vapor. It is not clear to me from the available testimony how the energy generator in the central column functioned.</p></div>

	~~<!--<h4>RFJ Extremely Hypothetical Take</h4>~~

	It is very likely that an extremely high axial magnetic field is present in the column generated by the ARV's main electromagnetic coil. Magnetic field lines have to connect after all. It is also possible the vacuum chamber inside the central column is not shielded from inertia and experiences the full range of inertial affects when the craft is accelerating/decelerating.

	One could create an asymmetric work cycle with an inertial-gradient generator by having one half of a fluid circulating loop in the high inertia vacuum chamber area and the other half of the tube in the inertialess area outside the chamber. The high levels of inertia will force the fluid to flow downward and into the area of the pipe outside the chamber where inertia is nullified and less energy is needed to move it back to the start to flow downward once again in the high inertia environment.-->

	<h3>Flywheel</h3>		<h3>Flywheel</h3>

Robert.francis.jr at 17:22, 21 May 2026

2026-05-21T17:22:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 21 May 2026
Line 108:		Line 108:
	<h3>Central Column Electricity Generator</h3>		<h3>Central Column Electricity Generator</h3>

	<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>This component more than any other has been difficult to decipher. McCandlish stated the column was partially under vacuum with Mercury vapor inside. Were the Mercury isotopes ones with an unpaired Neutron? That is unknown. High voltage discharges were said to occur down through the vapor. It is not clear to me from the available testimony how the energy generator in the central column functioned.</div>		<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>This component more than any other has been difficult to decipher. McCandlish stated the column was partially under vacuum with Mercury vapor inside. Were the Mercury isotopes ones with an unpaired Neutron? That is unknown. High voltage discharges were said to occur down through the vapor. It is not clear to me from the available testimony how the energy generator in the central column functioned.</p></div>

	<!--<h4>RFJ Extremely Hypothetical Take</h4>		<!--<h4>RFJ Extremely Hypothetical Take</h4>

Robert.francis.jr at 17:21, 21 May 2026

2026-05-21T17:21:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:21, 21 May 2026
Line 108:		Line 108:
	<h3>Central Column Electricity Generator</h3>		<h3>Central Column Electricity Generator</h3>

	<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>This component more than any other has been difficult to decipher. McCandlish stated the column was partially under vacuum with Mercury vapor inside. Were the Mercury isotopes ones with an unpaired Neutron? That is unknown. High voltage discharges were said to occur down through the vapor.</div>		<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>This component more than any other has been difficult to decipher. McCandlish stated the column was partially under vacuum with Mercury vapor inside. Were the Mercury isotopes ones with an unpaired Neutron? That is unknown. High voltage discharges were said to occur down through the vapor. It is not clear to me from the available testimony how the energy generator in the central column functioned.</div>

	<h4>RFJ Extremely Hypothetical Take</h4>		<!--<h4>RFJ Extremely Hypothetical Take</h4>

	It is very likely that an extremely high axial magnetic field is present in the column generated by the ARV's main electromagnetic coil. Magnetic field lines have to connect after all. It is also possible the vacuum chamber inside the central column is not shielded from inertia and experiences the full range of inertial affects when the craft is accelerating/decelerating.		It is very likely that an extremely high axial magnetic field is present in the column generated by the ARV's main electromagnetic coil. Magnetic field lines have to connect after all. It is also possible the vacuum chamber inside the central column is not shielded from inertia and experiences the full range of inertial affects when the craft is accelerating/decelerating.

	One could create an asymmetric work cycle with an inertial-gradient generator by having one half of a fluid circulating loop in the high inertia vacuum chamber area and the other half of the tube in the inertialess area outside the chamber. The high levels of inertia will force the fluid to flow downward and into the area of the pipe outside the chamber where inertia is nullified and less energy is needed to move it back to the start to flow downward once again in the high inertia environment.		One could create an asymmetric work cycle with an inertial-gradient generator by having one half of a fluid circulating loop in the high inertia vacuum chamber area and the other half of the tube in the inertialess area outside the chamber. The high levels of inertia will force the fluid to flow downward and into the area of the pipe outside the chamber where inertia is nullified and less energy is needed to move it back to the start to flow downward once again in the high inertia environment.-->

	<h3>Flywheel</h3>		<h3>Flywheel</h3>

Robert.francis.jr at 16:54, 21 May 2026

2026-05-21T16:54:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:54, 21 May 2026
Line 115:		Line 115:

	One could create an asymmetric work cycle with an inertial-gradient generator by having one half of a fluid circulating loop in the high inertia vacuum chamber area and the other half of the tube in the inertialess area outside the chamber. The high levels of inertia will force the fluid to flow downward and into the area of the pipe outside the chamber where inertia is nullified and less energy is needed to move it back to the start to flow downward once again in the high inertia environment.		One could create an asymmetric work cycle with an inertial-gradient generator by having one half of a fluid circulating loop in the high inertia vacuum chamber area and the other half of the tube in the inertialess area outside the chamber. The high levels of inertia will force the fluid to flow downward and into the area of the pipe outside the chamber where inertia is nullified and less energy is needed to move it back to the start to flow downward once again in the high inertia environment.

	~~If one could circulate a fluid through a pipe in the vacuum chamber when the craft is accelerating into a region with no inertia then </div>~~

	<h3>Flywheel</h3>		<h3>Flywheel</h3>

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:27, 18 June 2026
Line 17:		Line 17:
	<h3>Capacitor Array</h3>		<h3>Capacitor Array</h3>

	<h4>Biefeld-Brown Effect: Electrostatics~~, Unpaired Nucleon Spin Polarization, or Something Else Entirely?~~</h4>		<h4>Biefeld-Brown Effect: Two Components: Electrostatics and Electrodynamics</h4>

	<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>The Biefeld-Brown effect is largely seen in the scientific eye as lifters that are propelled by ion wind that they create by charging a positive and negative electrode to high voltages in the 30kV to 50kV range. Since there is no air in space to ionize and push off of lifters don't work in vacuum.</p>		<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>The Biefeld-Brown effect is largely seen in the scientific eye as lifters that are propelled by ion wind that they create by charging a positive and negative electrode to high voltages in the 30kV to 50kV range. Since there is no air in space to ionize and push off of lifters don't work in vacuum.</p>

	The next, ~~slightly more~~ accepted method of propulsion by BBE is asymmetric electrostatic pressure. This method charges up an asymmetric capacitor with a solid dielectric between the positive and negative electrodes using a static voltage that ~~is varied slightly to~~ maintain a persistent acceleration with Exodus Propulsion achieving a thrust of 1G.		The next, less accepted method of propulsion by BBE is asymmetric electrostatic pressure. This method charges up an asymmetric capacitor with a solid dielectric between the positive and negative electrodes using a static voltage that can maintain a persistent acceleration with Exodus Propulsion (a company founded by NASA electrostatics scientist Charles Buhler) achieving a thrust of 1G.

	A mostly unconsidered aspect of BBE is it could possibly be creating unpaired nucleon spin polarization in the capacitor array's ~~electrodes~~ and its dielectric. If the ARV's capacitor array was propelled strictly by asymmetric electrostatic pressure there would be no reason to make the capacitor plates in the capacitor array 1/2" thick. Cost and weight could be drastically reduced by using thin sheet metal for the plates. However, if the ARV is propelled by unpaired nucleon spin polarization then, the more mass, the more atoms with unpaired nucleons that are polarized in the same direction, the greater the propulsive effect. This idea was first seen in two patents by GE aerospace engineer Henry William Wallace in 1971 where he used high speed rotation of a brass disc to generate a small amount of unpaired nucleon spin polarization in the copper atoms in the disc.</div>		A mostly unconsidered aspect of BBE is through the use of electrodynamics, using dynamic voltages instead of static ones. The ARV could possibly be creating unpaired nucleon spin polarization in the capacitor array's copper plates and its dielectric. If the ARV's capacitor array was propelled strictly by asymmetric electrostatic pressure there would be no reason to make the capacitor plates in the capacitor array 1/2" thick. Cost and weight could be drastically reduced by using thin sheet metal for the plates. However, if the ARV is propelled by unpaired nucleon spin polarization then, the more mass, the more atoms with unpaired nucleons that are polarized in the same direction, the greater the propulsive effect. This idea was first seen in two patents by GE aerospace engineer Henry William Wallace in 1971 where he used high speed rotation of a brass disc to generate a small amount of unpaired nucleon spin polarization in the copper atoms in the disc akin to the Barnett effect.</div>

	<h4>Seven Capacitors Per Wedge, Not Four</h4>		<h4>Seven Capacitors Per Wedge, Not Four</h4>
Line 66:		Line 66:
	<h4>Dynamic Pulsed Voltages from a Tesla Coil and Tank Circuit</h4>		<h4>Dynamic Pulsed Voltages from a Tesla Coil and Tank Circuit</h4>

	<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>~~Most~~ Biefeld-Brown effect experiments in the record have used static DC voltages. This is ok for a capacitor that uses asymmetric electrostatic pressure for propulsion but a far larger propulsive effect can be generated by using pulsed DC voltages instead.</p>		<div class="mb-3 ms-5"><p>The vast majority of Biefeld-Brown effect experiments in the record have used static DC voltages. This is ok for a capacitor that uses asymmetric electrostatic pressure for propulsion but a far larger propulsive effect can be generated by using electrodynamics, pulsed DC voltages, instead.</p>

	Thomas Townsend Brown while working with the French company SUD Aviation on the BBE stated that while he was cleared to work with them on static aspects of the Biefeld-Brown effect, dynamic aspects (in other words, pulsed voltages) had been classified by the U.S. government. This revelation by Brown was reported in the Montgolfier Project document that SUD Aviation released on page 111 of the PDF, available in the Media section of this page.		Thomas Townsend Brown while working with the French company SUD Aviation on the BBE stated that while he was cleared to work with them on static aspects of the Biefeld-Brown effect, dynamic aspects (in other words, pulsed voltages) had been classified by the U.S. government. This revelation by Brown was reported in the Montgolfier Project document that SUD Aviation released on page 111 of the PDF, available in the Media section of this page.

	It is ~~our~~ belief that when pulsed voltages are applied to an asymmetric capacitor that during charging it temporarily results in unpaired nucleon spin polarization in the capacitor and a propulsive effect. That said, by continuously applying pulsed voltages to a capacitor it will eventually charge up and then behave like a capacitor with a static DC voltage applied.		It is RFJ's belief that when pulsed voltages are applied to an asymmetric capacitor that during charging it temporarily results in unpaired nucleon spin polarization in the capacitor and a propulsive effect. That said, by continuously applying pulsed voltages to a capacitor it will eventually charge up and then behave like a capacitor with a static DC voltage applied.

	The key to a consistent and powerful BBE capacitor is to use a high voltage, high frequency, source like a Tesla coil in combination with a tank circuit. Tesla coils can output extremely high voltages and at frequencies in the 10s of thousands to 100s of thousands of times a second. They do however normally output AC voltages not pulsed DC voltages.		The key to a consistent and powerful BBE capacitor is to use a high voltage, high frequency, source like a Tesla coil in combination with a tank circuit. Tesla coils can output extremely high voltages and at frequencies in the 10s of thousands to 100s of thousands of times a second. They do however normally output AC voltages not pulsed DC voltages.

	A tank circuit connects a current source, a capacitor, and an inductor (electromagnetic coil). When current is applied to the circuit the capacitor gets charged up, then it automatically discharges into the inductor. The inductor charges up creating an electromagnetic field around the inductor. The field collapses and the inductor discharges the current back into the capacitor. This process repeats over and over. With a tank circuit the capacitor never gets ~~fully~~ charged ~~and stays~~ that way, it is constantly fluctuating. The capacitor gets charged up, then fully discharges, then fully charges, etc. Normally in a tank circuit when the inductor's field collapses the positive and negative poles swap and the capacitor sees an AC current. By combining a Tesla coil, inductors, and capacitors, one can generate pulsed DC voltages for the capacitor array instead of AC voltages.		A tank circuit connects a current source, a capacitor, and an inductor (electromagnetic coil). When current is applied to the circuit the capacitor gets charged up, then it automatically discharges into the inductor. The inductor charges up creating an electromagnetic field around the inductor. The field collapses and the inductor discharges the current back into the capacitor. This process repeats over and over. With a tank circuit the capacitor never gets permanently charged, staying that way, it is constantly fluctuating. The capacitor gets charged up, then fully discharges, then fully charges, etc. Normally in a tank circuit when the inductor's field collapses the positive and negative poles swap and the capacitor sees an AC current. By combining a Tesla coil, inductors, and capacitors, one can generate pulsed DC voltages for the capacitor array instead of AC voltages.

	For example, a Tesla coil with an output of +3,500kV is connected to an inductor, the other end of the inductor is connected to the Top Plate 1. Plate 1 is connected to Plate 2 via another inductor. Plate 2 is connected to Plate 3 via another inductor This is done throughout the rest of the capacitor wedge with Plate 7 connected to the Bottom Plate 8 via an inductor and Plate 8 also connected to ground.		For example, a Tesla coil with an output of +3,500kV is connected to an inductor, the other end of the inductor is connected to the Top Plate 1. Plate 1 is connected to Plate 2 via another inductor. Plate 2 is connected to Plate 3 via another inductor This is done throughout the rest of the capacitor wedge with Plate 7 connected to the Bottom Plate 8 via an inductor and Plate 8 also connected to ground.