<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://backend.uapedia.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Cassirer%2C_Manfred</id>
	<title>Cassirer, Manfred - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://backend.uapedia.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Cassirer%2C_Manfred"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://backend.uapedia.wiki/index.php?title=Cassirer,_Manfred&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-17T14:49:21Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://backend.uapedia.wiki/index.php?title=Cassirer,_Manfred&amp;diff=315&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Robert.francis.jr: Created page with &quot;&lt;h2&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt; Manfred Cassirer is best known in this context for writing on the intersection of parapsychology and UFO topics. His ufology relevance is primarily conceptual: he is used to argue that “UFO phenomena” may involve psychological/psi dimensions beyond straightforward physical craft explanations.  &lt;h2&gt;Background&lt;/h2&gt; Cassirer wrote from a perspective that treats paranormal claims as potentially informative to the UFO question. On UAPedia, he fits wi...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://backend.uapedia.wiki/index.php?title=Cassirer,_Manfred&amp;diff=315&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-01-07T20:48:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Introduction&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt; Manfred Cassirer is best known in this context for writing on the intersection of parapsychology and UFO topics. His ufology relevance is primarily conceptual: he is used to argue that “UFO phenomena” may involve psychological/psi dimensions beyond straightforward physical craft explanations.  &amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Background&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt; Cassirer wrote from a perspective that treats paranormal claims as potentially informative to the UFO question. On UAPedia, he fits wi...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Introduction&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Manfred Cassirer is best known in this context for writing on the intersection of parapsychology and UFO topics. His ufology relevance is primarily conceptual: he is used to argue that “UFO phenomena” may involve psychological/psi dimensions beyond straightforward physical craft explanations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Background&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Cassirer wrote from a perspective that treats paranormal claims as potentially informative to the UFO question. On UAPedia, he fits within the long-running debate over whether UFO reports are “nuts-and-bolts,” “psi,” or a hybrid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Ufology career&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
His career presence in ufology is mainly through publishing rather than celebrity media circuits. He is a reference-point author more than a headline figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Early work (Year–Year)&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Early impact is connected to the circulation of his book within specialized readers who track psi research and UFO literature together.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Prominence (Year–Year)&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Prominence remains niche: he is not a mass-market ufologist, but is meaningful inside “consciousness-first” interpretive communities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Later work (Year–Year)&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Later citations often come from discussions comparing competing explanatory models and trying to reconcile “high strangeness” with investigative practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Major contributions&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
His major contribution is framing: treating UFO material as potentially overlapping with parapsychological phenomena rather than strictly aerospace mystery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Notable cases&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
He is less tied to single classic cases and more to the general “psi-UFO” argument.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Views and hypotheses&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Cassirer’s work is typically read as supportive of psi relevance, encouraging readers to broaden the explanatory toolkit beyond physical identification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Criticism and controversies (if notable)&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Critics argue psi-based framing can become unfalsifiable. Supporters argue it better matches the “high strangeness” aspects of some reports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Media and influence&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Influence is primarily bibliographic: he is cited in reading lists, forums, and comparative model debates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Selected works&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Parapsychology and the UFO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Legacy&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Cassirer remains a niche but persistent reference for readers who want ufology to include parapsychological mechanisms.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Robert.francis.jr</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>